serverless api key already exists

We really wish to keep generating the key separate from deployments. Note that Framework in many places allows to attach to existing (created and configured externally) resources. So its not a wrong pattern of management. Any ideas? As I said, a bug anywhere could happen, as it did for me. A good feature to reach this approach with AWS Api Gateway + Serverless Framework is called Api Keys. Why wont my SQLAlchemy frontend connect to my PostgreSQL backend? Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. AWS - API keys available on the Serverless Offline framework? It has 56 star(s) with 27 fork(s). I agree with the point that you might want to put this kind of resources into separate stacks and manage them there. So I suggest to have something like: serverless deploy --skipResources, so it wlll skip the resources that already exist and cloudformation wont bring that error. CloudFormation detects that the table's config is the same and only deploys the function. I can deploy a thousand times and never hit an issue. If there's a change in a resource, that single resource will be updated (see my previous comment to @bwship). Where custom.config.apiKeyId is an API Key ID you've configured that already exists. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. You list the API key name(s), and then mark the methods you wish to secure with it as private. Have a question about this project? About Amplify @brianneisler and @eahefnawy what are your thoughts on this? Already on GitHub? List all the API key names for which we want to generate the api keys, in provider section of serverless.yml as shown below. Sign in Also by definition running serverless requires not only to manage software but also the required operating systems from code. privacy statement. We have to pass the secret like a Header. That's also something AWS recommends. Thus, managing dynamodb externally tasks like the suggestion to go back to a hosted solution. In AWS SDK it's implemented with the ResourcesToImport parameter to createChangeSet. Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience. So I should to delete the stack and deploy serverless again. What stacktrace or error message from your provider did you see. One of my projects was set up with Cognito in early 2017. However, (as per feedback / request from customers) there's the option to group different lambda functions under one service.name (by explicitly setting the same service.name for different functions). I did a mistake to create a new DynamoDB table with wrong index, so I decided to delete the database and create again. Feel free to re-open if this is still a problem. It gives me an error because stream in this table was not SET, its ok. When the migration is complete, you will access your Teams at stackoverflowteams.com, and they will no longer appear in the left sidebar on stackoverflow.com. Position where neither player can force an *exact* outcome. While I agree CloudFormation should handle the resource existence related issues, I'd like there to be a functionality in serverless where I can easily pass a flag for skipping specific resources so it would not be included in the CF template to begin with. Not the answer you're looking for? You can control access to your APIs by requiring API keys within your AWS SAM template. If there are any viable workarounds I'm all ears. There exists no api key with that name. It generates the key even if one with the same name already exists in the environment. I had an API deployed on dev stage with api keys. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. It prevents continuous deployment on my system. Right now we have several severless files in First of all lets create our serverless project and, Then clean up the serverless.yml file until it looks like the following, Now we will add some NodeJS code to our handler.js, Perfect our API its responding OK, now we will create another EndPoint and test it. Later that year support was added, and we'd now like to add our Cognito config to serverless. This is a very core need. I agree that it's nice to have everything in one CloudFormation stack but you might want to split things up as soon as your service gets bigger and you want more control over the resources. Well there you go! But I think bug still applies if I want to have same keys. . You signed in with another tab or window. So this feature will save a lot of headache if this happen in a prod env. How about using the condition block of a resource to check if the resource exists? It comes in two versions: v1, also called REST API v2, also called HTTP API, which is faster and cheaper than v1 I had a bug that cloudformation just stuck at UPDATE_ROLLBACK_FAILED. in our CI system, commit is pushed and 'sls deploy --stage test' is called, I agree with @rowanu here. Having a similar issue with the ApiGatewayApiKey1 - API Key already exists. On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 7:21 PM Jeremy Thomerson ***@***. P.S. @berlinguyinca what do you mean when you say "technically recreate it"? Return Values Ref. Make sure the ports are properly configured. which means the referenced parameter key must exist in the deploying region's parameter store. You list the API key name (s), and then mark the methods you wish to secure with it as private. Why should you not leave the inputs of unused gates floating with 74LS series logic? than all integration tests are run and so on. So, I can keep making modifications to this stack, and it will modify that resource (if that resource had any changes in that deploy). we constantly deploy updates to the stack, which technically recreate it. Let's create it by using the aws-sam-cli. I would like the same feature to add my Cognito User Pools to CloudFormation @felschr. Currently, it seems that the multiple stacks/Fn::ImportValue route is the best option, with the unfortunate drawback of stack coupling :(. The first instance deployed I can see the api key and usage plan have a stackname containing the stage name - so will be unique. Erroneous handling of pre-existing event resources. Why does sending via a UdpClient cause subsequent receiving to fail? By November 4, 2022 ga dot physical requirements. serverless nodejs rest api united healthcare card serverless nodejs rest api meta recruiter reached out serverless nodejs rest api. serverless framework templates 05 Nov. serverless framework templates. Alternatively this can be done right now via the Resources block if deciding to use an existing API Key, but you will need to create an AWS::ApiGateway::UsagePlan and AWS::ApiGateway::UsagePlanKey set of resources and reference the current APIGatewayDeployment resource as a dependency, and reference the current AWS::ApiGateway::RestApi resource and stage name. @pmuens Ok I can put it into another stack. This includes adding in a custom usage plan with specific api keys enabled: https://serverless.com/framework/docs/providers/aws/guide/resources/. Hello @Shereef - are you experiencing this one the latest version? I'm going to spend the next x amount of time trying to figure out something that really hasn't changed a bit and should just deploy my code, yet it won't. In this case ServerLess should skip the creation of the pre-existent resource. @hermanmedsleuth then why is my serverless.yml file an interface to CF and not just a subset of it? Share Improve this answer Follow answered Aug 8, 2021 at 13:00 Andrey Makarov 46 2 Add a comment Your Answer Key Takeaways Serverless DBaaS is maturing, but a high barrier to entry remains DBaaS ease of use has to be about both developers and operators DBaaS delivered as Data APIs deliver that ease of. traefik-cloudflare tunnel Facebook multiple image upload in php w3schools Twitter proform sport rl rower power cord Pinterest maccabiah games 2022 events LinkedIn clinical domain psychology example Tumblr lake memphremagog swim race Email. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/43771000/how-to-migrate-dynamodb-data-on-major-table-change/43790256#43790256, Resource DynamoDb Error on deploy in another region, https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAD73HN7ALBT565HUI6JEDRP5Z2HANCNFSM4C6UDZTA, http://fiehnlab.ucdavis.edu/staff/wohlgemuth, https://www.linkedin.com/in/berlinguyinca, https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAD73EP24G6VRY3XHE3QW3RP6F27ANCNFSM4C6UDZTA, https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSCloudFormation/latest/UserGuide/resource-import-existing-stack.html, can not run deployment if dynamodb already exists, https://www.serverless.com/framework/docs/guides/compose. Could you please provide an example? Why are there contradicting price diagrams for the same ETF? To elaborate on this, I'm confused as to why it's not already the case considering a stage variable is included in the name of both the api and usage plan created by serverless. Oh wait, the folks at Senseless don't support this. Start using Socket to analyze serverless-add-api-key-with-usage-plan and its 2 dependencies to secure your app from supply chain attacks. By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers. use case is: The AWS::ApiGateway::ApiKey resource creates a unique key that you can distribute to clients who are executing API Gateway Method resources that require an API key. With API Keys we can secure all our API or some EndPoints and using the Serverless Framework to configuring in a pretty straight forward way. apiKeys: name: ${self:custom.config.stackName} . Because the premise that I'm operating on is: No other stack should define the same resource, so if I have that resource deployed from its original stack, how could I have another stack that "crashes" when I try to deploy it? With the GraphQL passthrough support preview capability available in Azure API Management, you can import existing GraphQL services as APIs in Azure API Management, leveraging all NVM, the service name got changed so the resource is in multiple stacks, Hey, I just realized that CloudFormation does have support for importing existing resources into a stack: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSCloudFormation/latest/UserGuide/resource-import-existing-stack.html. Right now you can create the key but cannot associate it to a usage plan (we've disabled our integration tests for that because of this). Usage plans, once generated once, will retain their UsagePlanId between deployments, even if you change the name of the plan (via UsagePlanName). @pgrzesik I don't think it's a serverless issue anymore But shouldn't it be possible to have the same values as serverless creates different APIs in API gateway for each stage? This means you use hosted services to augment your applicationsthink DynamoDB for data storage or Mailchimp for sending emails. "dev" stage), and then each developer can deploy the APIs / functions / etc to their own stages, but share the data sources. This was never solved in a Framework, as it's very difficult to solve on CloudFormation level (read the above comment for more info). But if you need to deploy the function to multiple stages, but all share the same table, then yes, definitely make them a separate stack. If that is the case, I can see your point, and maybe that is fine. From the cloudformation console it will be possible to manually import the failed resources, as specified here https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSCloudFormation/latest/UserGuide/resource-import-existing-stack.html. So long as the service name stays the same, you can deploy the same stage many times. Name for phenomenon in which attempting to solve a problem locally can seemingly fail because they absorb the problem from elsewhere? By November 4, 2022 No Comments 1 Min Read. Error using SSH into Amazon EC2 Instance (AWS), How to pass a querystring or route parameter to AWS Lambda from Amazon API Gateway. Serverless applications are often service-fullapplications. I'll keep this post updated with all errors that I found to convince you that it should be implemented. I get why ::ApiKey would behave this way but it's not clearly laid out in the documentation if this is true. I don't think this is a bug; You are trying to create a resource with exactly the same name as an existing resource, which is not allowed for DynamoDb Tables (but is allowed for other resources). What do you suggest as the best way to resolve those issues that block serverless? If your stack is getting recreated, then you're using it differently (e.g. We will also look at how we can define our output. Then, if they're working on the actual data sources, they can also deploy a second stage of those (i.e. The solution . Like RFCs that will let the Serverless user base tackle discussions like this a bit more formally? On average issues are closed in 39 days. sls deploy --stage stage2. per @AlexanderWert wrt the relationship between service.name and faas.id:. Deploy on another stage fails when api key is present, AWS::ApiGateway::ApiKey - GenerateDistinctId. A different key value and my problems go away. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: Seems that account key logical ids are account global. Further, these hostnames will change if you remove and redeploy your service, which can cause problems for existing clients. Try it Now REST API (API Gateway v1) API Gateway lets you deploy HTTP APIs. The Serverless usagePlan plugin object would need changed around here: serverless/lib/plugins/aws/package/compile/events/api-gateway/lib/usage-plan.js. Maybe that helps you guys to implement a better handling of table deployment in this framework. Back then Cognito wasn't supported by CloudFormation. So If my serverless consists of dynamodb only that doesn't change this fact. Serverless does add a few variables, though: Additionally, some behaviour about usage plans and usage plan keys: You may be interested in creating your auth structure outside of any one api deployment and using CloudFormation's (via Serverless) Outputs service to get the ARN and/or ID of each of the resources you've created: http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSCloudFormation/latest/UserGuide/outputs-section-structure.html. It's a sarcasm comment unless I don't get your sarcasm. Usage plans can be created outside the scope of an API deployment and referenced in using the UsagePlanId variable. Deploy on another stage fails when api key is present. But, what is an Api Key, in few words is: Is a unique string/password/secret of alphanumeric characters that is transmitted as part (as header) of the API request/call to authenticate the source of the API request. This plugin associates your Serverless service with same api key if the key already exists. Is that a stack not run by serverless? The plugin supports serverless stages, so you can create key (s) with different name in different stage. Then I manually deleted the table, triggered the deployment, the serverless created it, but the same error next deployment. iron maiden tour 2022 denver; dangerous android apps; nordictrack adjustable dumbbells manual; multiversus launch options steam; gray cowl of nocturnal skyrim id; Find centralized, trusted content and collaborate around the technologies you use most. I define a stack with this resource (database table, SQS queue, S3 bucket, etc), I should never delete that stack unless I no longer have a need for that resource. privacy statement. Resources Sign up for a free Azure account To create Serverless Azure Functions you will need a free Azure account Have a question about this project? Could we just have a simple plugin maybe? Updating objects won't remove associations (that I have been able to see) made outside of the stack, so it is safe to add outside keys to usage plan you create this way. Version: 3.4.0 was published by nhancers. Love podcasts or audiobooks? View on Github serverless-domain-manager Create custom domain names that your lambda can deploy to with serverless. What's the best way to roleplay a Beholder shooting with its many rays at a Major Image illusion? It is (probably most) often a service to a larger application. Not sure why that's a constraint between different stages. For example: Upon deploy, the framework generates the API key and assigns it to the functions. Is that a stack not run by serverless? Well occasionally send you account related emails. This plugin associates your Serverless service with same api key if the key already exists. The AWS will generate the actual keys for for each names we provided. OS: linux Node Version: 6.10.3 Serverless Version: 1.12.1 The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: . Is this a limitation in AWS? We like to share key values between stages and that should be allowed! You signed in with another tab or window. have everything crash. Serverless should skip creating keys if they exist. I would be happy for this feature to exists as well. I am constantly running in this issue aswell. Well occasionally send you account related emails. But now I got another problem: Same with SQS queues, it should be possible to just print a warning and not If necessary to reuse an API Key value you can pull the AWS API Key into a separate CloudFormation stack for shared resources and reference the generated API Key ID or Name. In scope of internal team we also put a lot of effort into Serverless Components, which are not backed by CloudFormation, so do not share its limitations. But that's not strictly necessary. Mind you I really had a blast hundred of other times deployed worked just perfectly :) and I'm grateful for those times. Even if it is not a real solution, I've found a workaround that is working for me, hope it can help. Each time you deploy, so long as you didn't change the table definition, the table won't change. Conflicting API keys when deploying same aws service to different stages. The plugin supports serverless stages, so you can create key (s) with different name in different stage. We have this whole API Key topic on our TODO-List since it's currently broken due to lack of "full CloudFormation support". I dont know if it is applicable to every "resources", atleast for databases I think. A lambda function is not always the entirety of an application. So I should to delete the stack and deploy serverless again. to your account, sls deploy --stage stage1 The plugin supports serverless stages, so you can create key(s) with different name in different stage. +1 to @jthomerson 's comment on May 4 which summarizes a pitfall of implementing this feature. But then when I change my table and redeploy I get same error from serverless. apiKeys: - myClientOne - myClientTwo. I am attempting to user ServerLess to manage this lambda, but I get the following error in deployment: I understand, from #1842, that ServerLess is failing when it attempts to create the topic. When using other services in your Serverless applications, you often need configuration data to make your application work correctly. List the API key names in serverless.yml. Have a question about this project? Why are standard frequentist hypotheses so uninteresting? Where should I add this flag in the yml file? If no resources are updated, Serverless will generally catch that there was no change (if the CloudFormation template it generates is exactly the same as the last one it deployed). Good question @mariogintili Thanks for asking! I didn't understand the logic of not working! Specifies whether the key identifier is distinct from the created API key value. @bwship yes, you can do it that way. In this example the key entries apiKeys or usagePlan were not added to the config block provider / apiGateway. Browse other questions tagged, Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers, Reach developers & technologists worldwide. https://forum.serverless.com/t/using-an-existing-api-key/770. Even so this AWS Bug persist since 2012. While what's being requested seems now "kind of" possible with CloudFormation (via combination of handling of DeletionPolicy and introduced not far ago import resources capability). different stage names each time, or modifying the service name between builds), or you're maybe deleting the stack between builds? I'd like to add to the crowd for a call for a skip feature. Although this might have changed since the last time we looked into it. But, I would love for it to be an explicit option rather than a default. sephora rival crossword clue; miami carnival 2022 location; seaside bird nyt crossword. But it's not a missing feature of Serverless, it's a missing feature of CloudFormation. If yes, could you please provide a reproducible example of this behavior? This plugin associates your Serverless service with same api key if the key already exists. When deploying a stack containing existing resources (for example dynamodb tables left untouched by a retention policy) it will fail but it will create a cloudformation stack and a bucket containing the cloudformation template. @nenti Yes, you could do that and then reference this DynamoDB with Cross-Stack-References (via Fn::ImportValue) to tie them together.. Also note that Serverless supports function-free services so you could even deploy this DynamoDB only-service via Serverless. Real-time dev mode provides streaming logs from your AWS Lambda Functions. You can use PostMan, or curl to query your api with the x-api-key header. This plugin associates your Serverless service with same api key if the key already exists. Resources gives you the ability to reference existing keys, plans, and other Resources. Amazon API Gateway publishes a regularly updated Serverless Developer Portal application in the AWS Serverless Application Repository and on GitHub.It is released under the Apache 2.0 license, which lets you customize and incorporate it into your build and deployment tools.The front end is written in React and is designed to be fully customizable. serverless nodejs rest api. @marckaraujo that plugin helps you to manage multiple CF stacks, like @rowanu and @HyperBrain suggested. I dived deep into it yesterday and it's CloudFormation not allowing me to use a duplicate value between 2 stages, Yes I am using the latest version of serverless, To reproduce it just create a minimal project and hard code the value and deploy to 2 stages it should fail on the second one and it's not serverless it's cloud formation throwing the error, I can't try to produce the example today but I will soon and let you know, @Shereef or @pgrzesik - I believe this is an issue with AWS generating the API Key ID based on the API Key value. API key example. If going back to serverless 1.80.0 will work, is the problem version 2.0? Test again the secured EndPoint without using the token, Its time to test our API Key to access our private EndPoint. To get the API key, go to your stack in the AWS console and click on the 'show' link. Additionally we published lots of new versions with fixes which should address this. I'm still not seeing a solution here for defining a pre-existing, possibly shared, resource as a trigger for a lambda, in ServerLess. Because serverless doesn't handle dynamodb. By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and Look in the red square now we have our API Key to access our private EndPoint. However, using AWS API Gatewayresults in odd hostnames for your endpoints. tl;dr - Use the resources structure to make raw CloudFormation configs. It may require tons of work (and new issues to fight with), as already observed by @kennu. Why bad motor mounts cause the car to shake and vibrate at idle but not when you give it gas and increase the rpms? Could an object enter or leave vicinity of the earth without being detected? You can deploy thousands of times, and the stack is not recreated - it's always just updated. This will allow you to change the usage plans independent of the apis themselves and maintain that separately. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: API keys in different stages should be independent of each other. different directories for deploying the stack, creating resources, etc. Delete the offending API mapping and all should work for you. To specify which API key clients must use, map the API key with the RestApi and Stage resources that include the methods that require a key.. Syntax. rev2022.11.7.43014. This seems like such a basic use case that I'm surprised i can't find any solution. @nenti Yes, you could do that and then reference this DynamoDB with Cross-Stack-References (via Fn::ImportValue) to tie them together. with Serverless Compose functionality: https://www.serverless.com/framework/docs/guides/compose. Can you give an example? This is usually the case when a function requires a parameter such as an API key, which is stored and available in one environment, but is then deployed into another environment which does not contain the key in its parameter store. The plugin by default displays the created key and value on the console. This allows you to creatively use multiple variables by using a certain naming pattern without having to update the values of these variables constantly. Key is that data can be accessed without the need to copy data into SQL tables.

Franklin County Schools Nc Calendar 22-23, Open World Serial Killer Game, Half Asleep Chris Northern Lights, Shell Aviation Careers, Le Pavillon Napoleon Suite, Tacoma Narrows Bridge Collapse Report, Ninja Camouflage Techniques,